ALLMedicine™ Penile Prosthesis Center
Research & Reviews 357 results
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.066
Urology Huynh LM, Huang E et. al.
Mar 11th, 2021 - Defining risks associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients undergoing penile prosthesis (PP) implantation remains controversial. This systematic review seeks to assess whether preoperative hemoglobin a1c (HbA1c) or serum glucose have been s...
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.021
Urology Loh-Doyle JC, Lin JS et. al.
Mar 1st, 2021 - To describe outcomes of reservoir placement, exchange, and extraction from the lateral retroperitoneum (LR) in complex patients with a three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients that ...
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.09.007
Sexual Medicine Reviews; Dinerman BF, Telis L et. al.
Feb 21st, 2021 - Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) technology is a mainstay in the treatment of erectile dysfunction refractory to medical management. Technological advancements in the design of 3-piece IPPs have been improved to optimize concealability and surgi...
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-021-01041-1 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0 10.1111/jsm.13004 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00540.x 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42726-1 10.1097/00005392-199909010-00022 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64477-1 10.1159/000049751 10.1155/2013/157379 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.10.002 10.1016/j.juro.2018.10.013 10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.10.008 10.21037/tau.2017.07.32 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02807.x 10.1007/s00345-018-2249-z 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01012.x 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.160 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)43131-4 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00266.x 10.1111/jsm.12361 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.002 10.1016/0090-4295(81)90020-0 10.1038/ijir.2010.16 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02202.x 10.1111/jsm.12408 10.1111/jsm.12000 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.029 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.06.012 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.09.020 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.06.006 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.015 10.1038/s41443-018-0101-z 10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.027 10.1111/jsm.12203 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.082 10.1038/s41443-019-0201-4 10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.030
Current Urology Reports; Van Dyke M, Baumgarten AS et. al.
Feb 8th, 2021 - To discuss mechanical and surgical innovations in inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery and their implications on reservoir placement and patient outcomes. The past decade has seen a new emphasis on optimizing outcomes and minimizing complica...
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.072
Urology Parikh KA, Pathak RA et. al.
Feb 6th, 2021 - To elucidate factors influencing Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) revision and describe outcomes associated with revision surgery. A single surgeon, retrospective review of all patients who underwent IPP revision between 2008-2016, was performed...
Guidelines 1 results
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.10.016
The Journal of Sexual Medicine; Osmonov D, Christopher AN et. al.
Dec 9th, 2019 - To date, several aspects of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgical procedure have been poorly studied. The aim of this study was to review the evidence associated with IPP implantation and provide clinical recommendations on behalf of the Eur...
Clinicaltrials.gov 357 results
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.066
Urology Huynh LM, Huang E et. al.
Mar 11th, 2021 - Defining risks associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients undergoing penile prosthesis (PP) implantation remains controversial. This systematic review seeks to assess whether preoperative hemoglobin a1c (HbA1c) or serum glucose have been s...
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.021
Urology Loh-Doyle JC, Lin JS et. al.
Mar 1st, 2021 - To describe outcomes of reservoir placement, exchange, and extraction from the lateral retroperitoneum (LR) in complex patients with a three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients that ...
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.09.007
Sexual Medicine Reviews; Dinerman BF, Telis L et. al.
Feb 21st, 2021 - Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) technology is a mainstay in the treatment of erectile dysfunction refractory to medical management. Technological advancements in the design of 3-piece IPPs have been improved to optimize concealability and surgi...
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-021-01041-1 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90224-0 10.1111/jsm.13004 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00540.x 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42726-1 10.1097/00005392-199909010-00022 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64477-1 10.1159/000049751 10.1155/2013/157379 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.10.002 10.1016/j.juro.2018.10.013 10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.10.008 10.21037/tau.2017.07.32 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02807.x 10.1007/s00345-018-2249-z 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01012.x 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.160 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)43131-4 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00266.x 10.1111/jsm.12361 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.002 10.1016/0090-4295(81)90020-0 10.1038/ijir.2010.16 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02202.x 10.1111/jsm.12408 10.1111/jsm.12000 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.029 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.06.012 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.09.020 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.06.006 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.015 10.1038/s41443-018-0101-z 10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.027 10.1111/jsm.12203 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.082 10.1038/s41443-019-0201-4 10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.030
Current Urology Reports; Van Dyke M, Baumgarten AS et. al.
Feb 8th, 2021 - To discuss mechanical and surgical innovations in inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery and their implications on reservoir placement and patient outcomes. The past decade has seen a new emphasis on optimizing outcomes and minimizing complica...
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.072
Urology Parikh KA, Pathak RA et. al.
Feb 6th, 2021 - To elucidate factors influencing Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) revision and describe outcomes associated with revision surgery. A single surgeon, retrospective review of all patients who underwent IPP revision between 2008-2016, was performed...
